Friday, 8 April 2016

8 April, 1592 - Muly Molocco

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at mvlo mvloco the 8 of aprell 1591 J.h.-01-10-00 ... xxiijs

In modern English: Received at Muly Molocco, 8th April, 1592 ... 23 shillings

1629 Portuguese illustration of the Battle of Alcazar
Henslowe's entry for today includes an enigmatic scribbled reference to paying or receiving £1 and 10 shillings, but unfortunately I do not know what this means. 

Anyway, today Lord Strange's Men returned again to Muly Molocco, a play that they frequently performed, and which they had last staged a week and a half ago. The play was about Abd el-Malik's struggle for the throne of Morocco; you can read more about it in the blog entry for 21st February.

After its surprise success during Easter Week, the box office returns for Muly Molocco were now the weakest it had ever received, although they are better thought of as simply returning to a more normal level for this particular play.

Monday, 21st February - 29 shillings
Tuesday, 29th February - 34 shillings
Friday, 17th March - 29 shillings
Wednesday, 29th March - 62 shillings
Saturday, 8th April - 23 shillings

What's next?


There will be no blog entry tomorrow because 9th April was a Sunday in 1592. Henslowe's Diary ... as a Blog! will thus return on 10th April for a week that will include old favourites along with a brand new play!


Henslowe links




Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!


Thursday, 7 April 2016

7 April, 1592 - Hieronimo

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at Jeronymo the 7 aprell 1591 ... xxvjs

In modern English: Received at Hieronimo, 7th April, 1592 ... 26 shillings

Woodcut from the 1615 edition of The Spanish Tragedy.
Today, Lord Strange's Men gave another performance of Hieronimo, which is almost certainly an alternate title for Thomas Kyd's The Spanish Tragedy, a play that they had previously performed just over a week ago. You can read more about this play in the entry for the 14th of March. This time, they performed it alone, rather than as a follow-up to The Spanish Comedy of Don Horatio.

The Spanish Tragedy was a very popular play and had produced spectacular box office back on the 14th and 31st March. But today's performance was extremely unimpressive by comparison, suggesting that the company may have revived it too soon after it had drawn big crowds in Easter Week.

14th March - 71 shillings
20th March - 38 shillings
31st March - 60 shillings
7th April - 26 shillings

Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!

Wednesday, 6 April 2016

6 April, 1592 - Brandimer

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at brandymer the 6 of aprell 1591 ... xxijs

In modern English: Received at Brandimer, 6th April, 1592 ... 22 shillings

For the last two weeks, Lord Strange's Men have been cycling through their most popular plays. But today, they have decided to try something different: a play called Brandimer. Henslowe doesn't label it as "new", so the company was presumably blowing the dust off an old play from the archives. Unfortunately, Brandimer is lost and its subject matter is uncertain. However, two possible explanations for its title have been proposed, both of which could have produced thrilling stage material. So let's explore these two theories...

Brandimart?


Orlando's knights, from a 1584
Venetian edition of Orlando
Furioso at the Newberry
Library
In his 1904 study of Henslowe's Diary, W.W. Greg suggested that Brandimer was about  Brandimart (or Brandimarte), a character in Ludovico Ariosto's epic poem Orlando Furioso. The repertory of Lord Strange's Men already included Robert Greene's stage adaptation of that poem, which the company had performed back in February, so perhaps Brandimer was some kind of companion play?

One complication is that the character of Brandimart is extremely different in the poem and the play. In Ariosto's poem, Brandimart is one of a team of heroes who aids Orlando in his adventures; he performs heroic actions at the siege of Biserta, and is later killed when Orlando and company fight North African warriors on the island of Lampedusa. By contrast, in Greene's extremely loose stage adaptation, Brandimart is a villain, a rival suitor to Angelica who is killed by the mad Orlando halfway through the play. If Brandimer was about Brandimart, which Brandimart was portrayed? Was the plot simply inconsistent with Greene's play, or did the playwright invent a largely non-Ariostoan prequel to Greene's?

There are certainly lot of reasons to believe the play was about Brandimart. The existence of Greene's play in the company's repertory makes a connection with Orlando Furioso seem obvious. And even if the lost play was based more on Ariosto than Greene, the battles against Islamic foes in the poem would fit with common themes in the plays of Lord Strange's Men. The only snag is that Brandimart is not a particularly distinctive or important character in either the poem or in Greene's play, so that it is hard to imagine why an entire play might have been named after him.

Brandimore?


Guy of Warwick fighting the giant Colbrand,
from The History of the Famous Exploits
of Guy, Earl of Warwick
(1680)
A leftfield but equally convincing theory is proposed by Martin Wiggins, who points to the legend of Guy of Warwick, a folk hero whose adventures were retold many times in medieval and Renaissance England on the page, on stage, and in song. In the many tales associated with him, Guy battles enemies and vanquishes monsters in order to prove himself to the woman he loves. And in a 1612 ballad entitled Saint George's Commendation to all Soldiers, Guy kills a giant named Brandimore. Could Brandimer have been a play about Guy of Warwick, with a memorable scene of the slaying of Brandimore?

The ballad in question is a yobbishly patriotic effort that probably sounds better after four pints of lager. Each verse describes the adventures of various warrior heroes from history and myth before concluding "St George for England, St Denis for France / Honi soit qui mal y pense!" One verse goes as follows:

The noble Earl of Warwick, that was called Sir Guy,
The infidels and pagans much did he defy,
He slew the giant Brandimore, and after was the death
Of that most ghastly dun-cow, the Devil of Dunsmore Heath,
Besides his noble deeds done beyond the seas.
St George, St George, the dragon did appease,
St George for England, St Denis for France,
Honi soit qui mal y pense!

Wiggins points out that many of the other heroes mentioned in the ballad appear in plays performed at Henslowe's playhouses, including Orlando, Godfrey of Bouillon, Sir John Mandeville, and several others that we will meet later in the year. So, if you wanted to speculate wildly, you could propose that the ballad-maker was conjuring memories of plays performed back in the days of Good Queen Bess. If so, as Wiggins suggests, the ballad verse might record what happened in the play: the slaying of Brandimore, adventures beyond the seas during the Crusades, and Guy's most famous deed, the vanquishing of the monstrous Dun Cow (an escaped giant cow who caused mayhem on Dunsmore Heath, near Warwick).

[Update, 19/4/16 - Reader Matthew Steggle helpfully comments that there's a more detailed description of Guy of Warwick fighting "the giant Brandamore" in the popular prose work The Famous History of the Seven Champions of Christendom by Richard Johnson, first published in 1616. In it, Guy is one of a team of knights attacked by three giants, including Brandamore, "a mishapen Fiend, whose bulk is a weight too heavy for the Earth to bear". Guy punches Brandamore so hard "that he tumbled backwards over the dead carcasses of two or three slaughtered soldiers", but eventually, it is another knight who kills Brandamore after the latter "through the weight of his armour, and the hotness of the weather, sweat so abundantly that it ran into his eyes and quite blinded him".  Incidentally, searching for 'Brandamore' in Early English Books Online also brings up a Dialogue between the Two Giants in Guildhall, Colebrond and Brandamore, Concerning the Late Election of Citizens to Serve in Parliament for the City of London (1661)! The Guildhall giants are normally associated with Gog and Magog, however. It's all rather intriguing, and an enthusiastic researcher could probably discover a lot more about the giant Brandamore in early modern English culture.]

This theory is very tempting, but could a fight with a giant really be performed onstage? Yes it could. A 1590s play about Guy of Warwick does exist, and it does indeed include a sequence in which Guy fights a giant. The giant is called Colbron, so this play can't be the hypothetical Brandimore, but it does suggest that such a scene was not  impossible. As for the slaying of the Dun Cow, though, I'm not so sure... in the surviving play, a character merely reminisces about "the wild cow slaughtered / That kept such revels upon Dunsmore Heath".

The Dun Cow

Which was it?


Both of these theories have their strong points. But I'm going to plump for Brandimore, for reasons that are entirely frivolous: for me, the possibility - however slight - that a play might have featured a warrior battling a giant cow onstage is so entertaining that I have resolved to believe in it, no matter what.


FURTHER READING


Brandimer information

Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!

Tuesday, 5 April 2016

5 April, 1592 - Harry VI

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at harey the vj the 5 of aprell 1591 ... xxxxjs

In modern English: Received at Harry VI, 5th April, 1592 ... 41 shillings

1540s portrait of King
Henry VI
Today, Lord Strange's Men performed Harry VI again. This play was almost certainly Shakespeare's First Part of Henry VI; you can read more about it in the blog entry for 3rd March.

The company last performed Harry VI just over a week ago; since its premiere in early March, it has been their most frequently-performed play. However, today's production did not repeat its spectacular takings during Easter Week, returning to a merely moderate intake similar to that of The Jew of Malta yesterday. This lower-but-still-not-bad intake is proving to be typical of this week.

  • Friday, 3rd March - 75 shillings
  • Tuesday, 7th March - 60 shillings
  • Saturday, 11th March - 47 shillings
  • Thursday, 16th March - 31 shillings
  • Tuesday, 28th March - 68 shillings
  • Wednesday, 5th April - 41 shillings

Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!





Monday, 4 April 2016

4 April, 1592 - The Jew of Malta

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at the Jewe of malta the 4 of aprell 1591 ... xxxxiijs 

In modern English: Received at The Jew of Malta, 4th April, 1592 ... 43 shillings


Caravaggio's portrait of the Grand
Master of the Knights of Malta,
1607-8.
Today, Lord Strange's Men performed their satirical comic tragedy The Jew of Malta again. You can read more about this play in the blog entry for 26th February.

The company had last performed this play two and a half weeks ago, receiving disappointing box office returns. On this outing, the play was a bit more successful, but still not as much as it had been in the past. As with yesterday's performance, we are not seeing the surprise hits that we saw during Easter Week.

  • Saturday, 26th February - 50 shillings
  • Friday, 10th March - 56 shillings
  • Saturday, 18th March - 39 shillings
  • Tuesday, 4th April, 43 shillings




Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!

Sunday, 3 April 2016

3 April, 1592 - Machiavel

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at matchevell the 3 of aprell 1591 ... xxijs

In modern English: Received at Machiavel, 3rd April, 1592 ... 22 shillings

Niccolò Machiavelli, the
original machiavel.
Today, Lord Strange's Men performed again their lost play about a machiavel (a devious, manipulative villain). You can read more about this play in the entry for 2nd March.

The company had not performed this play for a month. Then, it had made an unimpressive 14 shillings. This time it made a few shillings more, but was still not drawing big crowds. Was this because Easter Week was over and fewer Londoners could spare time for theatre? Or was it simply that Machiavel was not a very good play?


Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!

Friday, 1 April 2016

1 April, 1592 - Sir John Mandeville

Here's what Lord Strange's Men performed at the Rose playhouse on this day, 424 years ago...

Henslowe writes: R at mandefell the 1 of aprell 1591 ... xxxs

In modern English: Received at Mandeville, 1st April, 1592 ... 30 shillings

Mandevillian monster from
the Nuremberg Chronicle (1493)
Today, Lord Strange's Men performed again their lost play about Sir John Mandeville. Although Mandeville is today most famous for his fantastical travel narratives, this play was probably a chivalric and comic romance, in which Sir John won the hand of a fair lady above his station. You can read more about it in the entry for 24th February.

The company had not performed Sir John Mandeville for over 5 weeks, and with good reason, as it had made only a paltry 12 shillings last time. However, this time it received a more solid 30 shillings. This turnaround is in keeping with the generally above average box office of this week, and is further evidence that Easter Week was great for business in the Elizabethan theatre .

What's next?


There will be no blog entry tomorrow because 2nd April was a Sunday in 1592. Henslowe's Diary ... as a Blog! will thus return on 3rd April and we'll see if the company's run of success will last...


Henslowe links



Comments?


Did I make a mistake? Do you have a question? Have you anything to add? Please post a comment below!